Rendell: Hijacking the Reform Train
Governor Ed Rendell should step aside from his bid to
become the state’s reformer-in-chief. While some of
his ideas may have merit, the Governor has no more
right than the average citizen to prescribe the structure
of state government in Pennsylvania and his viewpoint
is distorted by his position.
Perhaps his goal of a better open records policy is
desirable, but his suggestion of creating an Office of
Public Records Advocate might be just another plump
patronage position to be filled by political pals. Maybe
the people can come up with a better plan for making
government more transparent.
Perhaps merit selection for state appellate judges is
an idea worth considering, but what if the people
would rather make all judicial races non-partisan
affairs and ban contributions to those races by
lawyers?
How could Rendell’s proposed Appellate Court
Nominating Commission, dominated by a majority of
legislative and executive appointees and confirmed by
the Senate, improve the independence of the
judiciary? Independence from the other two branches
should be encouraged, but independence from the
sovereign people at the voting booth should not.
Perhaps the Governor’s suggested campaign finance
limits appear to level the electoral playing field. On the
other hand, maybe the people of this Commonwealth
realize that the voter revolt of 2006 would not have
been possible under those limitations and that no
financial ceiling could ever negate the current
incumbency protection program.
Perhaps Rendell’s legislative term limits sound like a
good idea, but reality in Pennsylvania suggests that if
the General Assembly was truly part-time and was
stripped of the unconstitutional perks it now enjoys,
term limits would be utterly unnecessary.
Perhaps Pennsylvanians want a smaller legislature,
but maybe they’d like a larger one, or to keep its size
the same, with some of the above mentioned features
and fewer expenses. Maybe they want to look at the
other 49 states to see what others are doing before
deciding which path is best for the Commonwealth.
Perhaps the time has come for citizen redistricting, but
Rendell’s 11-member commission would include four
legislators and three appointees of the governor, two
of whom would be legislators. The remaining four
would be appointed by - you guessed it - the four
legislative caucus leaders. Pennsylvanians just might
have a slightly different notion of how a citizens’
redistricting commission should look.
On constitutional issues in Pennsylvania, the
governor’s opinion has no more real or deserved
weight than the average citizen’s. Perhaps the
Governor has some good ideas. Perhaps he doesn’t.
Either way, today’s climate dictates that constitutional
change should not be viewed only through the myopic
lens of the chief executive.
The merit of Rendell’s ideas have should be
discussed openly among citizens, not quietly between
the three branches of government. Other citizens
should be able to discuss their ideas as well. The
proper forum for such a discussion is a constitutional
convention. Surely, the Governor would be free to
provide his vision for consideration at such a
gathering.
“Citizens will not rest until there is an end to perks, an
end to control by private interests and an end to
political rules that shut them out of the process,” the
Governor said in a press release. But his plan
eliminates no perks, suppresses the freedom of
speech in political races and utterly shuts the people
out of the process of structural change.
Nearly two years after the reform train left the station
as Ed Rendell signed the pay raise, the Governor is
using his bully pulpit to try to hijack it. Perhaps he
doesn’t realize that many other citizens were on board
well ahead of him. Their voices on constitutional
matters deserve an equally fair hearing.
In announcing his preferred reforms, Rendell
expressed trepidation at the prospect of a
constitutional convention, but if he truly believes in the
right of self-governance as enumerated by Article I of
the Constitution, a carefully crafted citizens’ convention
provides no cause for hand wringing, anguish or
hesitation of spirit.
A plan for such a convention of the people is available
at www.PACleanSweep.com.
Citizens’ Constitutional Convention Act of 2009
Find Your Local Legislators
Read the Governor's Proposed "Reforms"
About PACleanSweep
PACleanSweep is a non-partisan effort dedicated to
returning honor, dignity and integrity to government
in Pennsylvania. For
more information, please visit
www.PACleanSweep.com.