Reason #4: Innocent Bystanders
Much of the criticism being flung at PACleanSweep's
anti-retention campaign has come in the form of the
argument that local and/or lower court judges had
nothing to do with the pay raise. Some judicial
defenders paint these judges as innocent bystanders.
They had no role in making the decision, they claim.
Therefore, the argument goes, PACleanSweep's
campaign against them is unfair.
But are they really innocent bystanders?
Chief Justice Ralph Cappy did not act in rogue
fashion. He is the top administrator and spokesman
for the entire judicial branch. His job is to make sure
the judicial branch's needs and wants are met. He
wouldn't have approached the legislature for a pay
raise if a majority of lower court judges hadn't
somehow pressured him to do so.
Maybe they didn't encourage him to sneak around
behind closed doors with the other two branches, and
perhaps they didn't convince the legislature to violate
Article III of the Constitution, but that didn't keep a
roomful of judges from giving Cappy a standing
ovation in Hershey shortly after those very things
happened.
Even if those judges weren't fully aware of the
constitutional predicament when they gave Cappy a
standing ovation, they must have pondered it at some
point. Didn't they hear about the 2006 legislative
elections? Even before that electoral bloodbath, the
legislature wised up and repealed the pay raise after
Justice Nigro took it on the chin. Surely, other judges
heard about his fate.
Despite the first-ever non-retention of a Supreme
Court justice in Pennsylvania, judges still
apparently didn't
get the message voters were sending.
It was lower court judges who in December 2005 filed
the lawsuits to get the pay raise back. They made no
mention of the Article III issues - all they wanted was
the money. The Supreme Court grabbed those
cases - and another suit filed by activist Gene Stilp,
which had already been thrown out as moot -
via its
extraordinary King's Bench power. With three cases
from which to cherry-pick, they performed some real
judicial gymnastics to keep the pay raise in effect - for
judges and judges alone.
While the Supreme Court made the decision, it would
not have been possible without the cases filed by a
handful of lower court judges - none of whom would
ever have to face the voters again, conveniently.
By all accounts, every Common Pleas and local judge
is still accepting the money today. They could have
chosen to protest the Supreme Court's ruling by
quietly repaying the money to the people of
Pennsylvania. Joan Orie Melvin and Debra Todd did
exactly that. What exactly is preventing all the other
judges from doing the same thing? Until they do, we
can only assume they believe the Supreme Court's
bizarre decision on the pay raise was proper. That just
doesn't sit too well with most Pennsylvanians.
The real innocent bystanders in the "judicial swindle"
are the citizens of this Commonwealth.
The very judges who swore to "support, obey and
defend" our constitutional guarantee of a deliberative
legislative process stood idly by while that guarantee
was trampled in July 2005. Not only did they stand idly
by, but some of them actively sought to reassert the
trampling after the legislature corrected its mistake.
Today, the vast majority of judges are personally
benefiting as a result.
Innocent bystanders are those who have absolutely
nothing to do with a given situation. They are victims of
circumstances they do not control in any way, shape or
form. Innocent bystanders are people who are simply
in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Every step of the way on the judicial pay raise, lower
court judges had a hand in the matter. Before, during
and after, they played a critical role. Without their
participation, it wouldn't be an issue at all.
This wrong must be righted. If those who swore to
uphold the Constitution won't act, then We the People
must. It's our choice, it's our duty and it's our
responsibility to future generations of Pennsylvanians.
Vote 'NO' on November 6!
Top Ten Reasons to Vote 'NO'
Get Your 'VOTE NO' Yard Signs
Citizens' To Do List
Permission is hereby granted to reproduce text from
this article with attribution to PACleanSweep.
About PACleanSweep
PACleanSweep is a non-partisan effort dedicated to
reforming state government in Pennsylvania. For
more information, please visit
www.PACleanSweep.com.